How quickly are AI capabilities improving, and is there credible evidence that the pace of progress is slowing?
AI Models & Capabilities
AI capabilities are improving rapidly, with sources describing "very fast improvements" [5] and ongoing advancements that are accelerating progress through feedback loops, such as AI writing code at companies like Anthropic, potentially leading to autonomous AI development within 1-2 years [3]. This growth is evident in AI's "spiky" intelligence, excelling in expert-level tasks across many areas while showing deficiencies in others [7], and causing market disruptions as capabilities expand [8]. However, the pace is not exponential; a METR report claiming such growth since 2019 is challenged by data showing no support for it, even short-term [1].
There is credible evidence suggesting the pace of progress may be slowing or hitting limits. Productivity gains remain scarce despite fast improvements and vast investments [2,10], with tensions arising from exploding costs outpacing returns [6]. Challenges like regulatory hurdles, talent shortages, and funding constraints could slow infrastructure expansion [11], and alternative AI approaches are emerging as large language models (LLMs) are seen as approaching a "wall," though this diversifies pathways forward [4]. Jagged abilities also limit short-term utility, tempering adoption speed [9].
Sources
- Are AI Capabilities Increasing Exponentially? A Competing Hypothesis — arXiv
- The AI productivity boom is not here (yet) — AFR
- AI technology developments in early 2026 — Substack
- There are now over a half dozen extremely well-funded companies from famous AI researchers building alternative approaches to AI, betting LLM-based technologies hit a wall. The overall effect is that there are now more pathways than ever for keeping AI development moving forward. — @emollick
- If you consider the combination of very fast improvements in AI, a lack of knowledge about abilities, high uncertainty about the future, the fact that guardrails are decided by AI labs, & that AI has very wide impact … expect mostly reactive, ad hoc & scattered policy responses. — @emollick
- The tension between exploding AI investment costs and slow productivity growth — JSTOR
- r/singularity on Reddit: It's been 10 years since AlphaGo's Move 37. Would 2016-you be impressed or disappointed by where AI is today? — Reddit
- So over the past week you are seeing exactly what you would expect if AI is, in fact, both gaining capabilities & proving to be very useful: - Rolling market disruption in response to growing awareness of AI capacity -Government versus lab struggles for control & still very early — @emollick
- People on this site systematically overestimate the speed at which companies can deeply adopt AI & underestimate the impact of AI’s jagged abilities in limiting AI’s utility in the short run. — @emollick
- The AI productivity boom is not here (yet) — The Economist
- Is AI's Biggest Buildout Hitting a Wall? — The Information
- Opinion | Should the U.S. slow AI’s growth? — The Washington Post
- How Suddenly will AI Accelerate the Pace of AI progress? — Forethought
Related questions
- →What is retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and why is it important for enterprise AI deployment?
- →How should non-technical executives evaluate and compare AI model performance benchmarks?
- →What is multimodal AI, and why does it matter for practical business applications?
- →What are AI agents, and how do they differ from standard large language model deployments?